Magic Eden flags Ethereum NFT drain tied to Limit Break Payment Processor V2

HACK OR EXPLOITMagic Eden flags Ethereum NFTdrain tied to Limit BreakPayment Processor V222IMPORTANCECLOSED1NEWS MEDIA1PIECESSep 28, 2026 13:54blockboard.net

Magic Eden said an exploit tied to Limit Break’s Payment Processor V2 could let NFTs be drained from wallets that once interacted with its earlier Ethereum setup, and it told users to revoke approvals. A later warning said the issue could still affect assets in wallets that still have unrecalled authorizations after the Sept. 25 incident.

What this rests on

Claim by claim, with its source
✓
Magic Eden said an exploit involving Limit Break’s Payment Processor V2 could let attackers drain NFTs from wallets that used the marketplace’s earlier Ethereum setup.
✓
Magic Eden urged users to revoke approvals, and framed the issue as tied to older permissions rather than an active Magic Eden trading flow.
✓
Quit (0xQuit) warned that assets in wallets with unrecalled authorizations may still be stolen after the Sept. 25 incident.
✓
The warning came from Yuga Labs VP Quit (0xQuit).

What it means

Who it affects, what changes and what is still unconfirmed

Each sentence links inside to the piece that supports it.

Users who interacted with Magic Eden’s earlier Ethereum setup are the ones who notice this first, because the warning points to wallets with older approvals that may still be exposed. Anyone holding assets in wallets with unrecalled authorizations would need to pay attention immediately, since the issue is described as affecting those permissions rather than current marketplace activity.

What changes in practice is that revoking approvals becomes the relevant action for the affected wallets, while the normal Magic Eden trading flow is described as not being the focus. The Sept. 25 incident remains the reference point, and the warning does not change the fact that the concern is about prior authorizations already granted.

Market reaction

ET Ethereum the event is about this asset from 2 h before to 4 h after the line marks the first headline
published
+0.79 % before publication
+0.46 % after
$2,689price at publication
12series points

The move was larger before the first headline than after. That is an observation, not an explanation: the market also moves on things nobody publishes.

How the story was built

Every piece in order, with the time its news medium declares — if it is not believable we use ours and say so — and what it added to what was already known at that point. Arriving first is not the same as adding something.

first
Sep 28 13:49

Other recent incidents

WhenWhat happenedFigure
2 days ago KolanHook (1.279453 ETH) incident no figure in dollars
3 days ago UNCX Network V2 · Incorrect Share Accounting incident $86k
3 days ago Pirate Chain · Transaction validation vulnerability incident $10.7M
4 days ago Gamdom · Hot wallet server compromise incident $4.2M
7 days ago Papertrade · Price manipulation incident $1.3M

4197 incidents stored

What could happen next

What the prediction markets currently price as likely. This is context, not a forecast of ours: there is money on it, and that is all we show.

0 % no series
Polymarket · $1,201,606 negociados en 24 h · resolves on Oct 1, 2026
0 % no series
Polymarket · $191,019 negociados en 24 h · resolves on Sep 27, 2026
6 % -3 pts
Kalshi · $185,377 of open interest · resolves on Jan 1, 2027
4 % +0 pts
Kalshi · $174,646 of open interest · resolves on Jan 1, 2027