Bitget CEO Gracy Chen Says Scammers Posed as an Investment Firm to Target Her After the Hack
After Bitget’s roughly $387.5 million breach, Gracy Chen said impostors later contacted her while posing as an investment firm’s team, and Bitget said withdrawals were restored on Oct. 2. Separate follow-up coverage added that the exchange’s protection fund reached $309 million, while investigators and security firms described tracing work, recovery limits, and the attack path across multiple chains.
What this rests on
What it means
Each sentence links inside to the piece that supports it.
For day-to-day operations, the reporting shows a shift in what the exchange and investigators could do after the breach: SlowMist described a zero-day exploit and fraudulent withdrawals from hot wallets, while Chainalysis said it traced the funds across multiple networks and protocols with in-house AI and custom automation. The practical change was in how the incident was being handled and mapped, not in any announced return of the stolen assets themselves.
Market reaction
How the story was built
Every piece in order, with the time its news medium declares — if it is not believable we use ours and say so — and what it added to what was already known at that point. Arriving first is not the same as adding something.
Thefts of a similar size
| When | What happened | Figure |
|---|---|---|
| 3.9 years ago | FTX · Phishing incident | $450M |
| 5.8 years ago | OneCoin · Scam incident | $440M |
| 23 days ago | Bitget incident | $351.6M |
| 4.7 years ago | Portal · Signature Verification Flaw incident | $326M |
| 41 days ago | Liquid Network incident | $320M |
4197 incidents stored · 20 were as large as this one or larger ($388M)
What could happen next
What the prediction markets currently price as likely. This is context, not a forecast of ours: there is money on it, and that is all we show.