Anza’s SIMD-0675 would schedule Solana validators by geography
Anza’s SIMD-0675 proposal would assign Solana validators by geography and group nearby validators in the leader schedule. The proposal is still open, and it relies on self-reported location data. A simulation tied to the proposal said validator handover latency fell by 53%.
What this rests on
What it means
Each sentence links inside to the piece that supports it.
Solana validators are the group that would notice this change first, because the proposal changes how they are placed in the leader schedule. That would affect participation and location disclosure for operators who take part, since the design uses self-reported location data and groups nearby validators.
In practice, the setup would move from a non-geographic schedule to one that sorts validators by geography, while the open proposal remains under review. The location information is still self-reported, so the scheduling rule changes even though the underlying source of the location data does not.
Market reaction
How the story was built
Every piece in order, with the time its news medium declares — if it is not believable we use ours and say so — and what it added to what was already known at that point. Arriving first is not the same as adding something.
Has this happened before?
| When | What happened | Figure |
|---|---|---|
| 17 days ago | Tokenized Stocks Cross $3 Billion in 2026 RWA Market Growth event | 1 actors in common · 3 news media |
| 22 days ago | Solana Developers Advance SIMD-0112 To Cut Validator Latency event | 1 actors in common · 2 news media |