ZetaChain votes to shut down Layer 1 network and move ZETA to Solana

REGULATORY DECISIONZetaChain votes to shut downLayer 1 network and moveZETA to Solana48IMPORTANCECLOSED3NEWS MEDIA3PIECESSep 22, 2026 20:33blockboard.net

ZetaChain governance approved Proposal 68, which sets out a plan to wind down the project’s Layer 1 and move ZETA to Solana as an SPL token at a 1:1 ratio. The vote reached 58% participation and 99.4% support, above the stated quorum, while a later governance step is still needed for shutdown and swap details. The team has also said it plans to focus on Anuma, its private AI app.

What this rests on

Claim by claim, with its source
✓
The team plans to focus instead on Anuma, its private AI app, and the migration still needs one more vote.
✓
Proposal 68 passed with 99.4% support.
✓
Voting participation reached 58%, above the 40% quorum.
✓
The existing ZetaChain Layer 1 is still operating, and the shutdown and swap details need a later governance proposal.

What it means

Who it affects, what changes and what is still unconfirmed

Each sentence links inside to the piece that supports it.

Holders and users tied to ZETA now face a governance-approved path toward a Solana-based token structure, while the current Layer 1 remains active for now. That means the change is visible to the project community today, but the shutdown and swap mechanics are not yet finalized.

In practice, the vote has established the direction of travel: ZETA would move to a Solana SPL token on a 1:1 basis, rather than remain native only to the Layer 1. What has not changed yet is the live status of the existing network, which is still operating until the later proposal is handled.

Still open is the exact process for winding down the Layer 1 and carrying out the migration, since those details require another governance proposal. It is also not settled how the focus on Anuma will interact with the token move, beyond the stated plan to prioritize the private AI app.

Market reaction

We track SOL, but we only have 0 price points in that window. The series is stored every half hour, so newer events will have it. Computing it from two points would not be a reaction, it would be a coincidence.

How the story was built

Every piece in order, with the time its news medium declares — if it is not believable we use ours and say so — and what it added to what was already known at that point. Arriving first is not the same as adding something.

first
Sep 20 20:11
+1 d
Sep 21 21:10
The Defiant context
Its angle: exceeding, replacing, direction
+2 d 7 h
Sep 23 03:30
Bitcoinist context
Its angle: overwhelmingly, comfortably, operational; with quotes

Has this happened before?

Nothing comparable yet.