EU banking watchdog calls for crypto lending rules under MiCA

REGULATORY DECISIONEU banking watchdog calls forcrypto lending rules underMiCA34IMPORTANCEQUIET4NEWS MEDIA4PIECESSep 24, 2026 10:35blockboard.net

On Sept. 24, the European Banking Authority set out possible additions to the EU’s crypto rulebook, including crypto lending, leverage limits, and certification for access to DeFi lending protocols. One separate proposal would bar EU crypto service providers from arranging or facilitating borrowing and lending involving stablecoins that do not have MiCA authorization. The ideas were part of the European Commission’s review of MiCA, which does not cover crypto lending today.

What this rests on

Claim by claim, with its source
✓
The EBA outlined possible rules for crypto lending and for firms that give access to DeFi protocols as part of the European Commission’s MiCA review.
✓
The EBA also floated leverage caps and a certification requirement for access to DeFi lending protocols.
✓
The EBA floated a ban on EU crypto service providers arranging or facilitating borrowing and lending that involves stablecoins without MiCA authorization.

What it means

Who it affects, what changes and what is still unconfirmed

Each sentence links inside to the piece that supports it.

Crypto users and service providers in the EU are the clearest immediate audience for these proposals. If they are picked up in the MiCA review, access to lending services and DeFi lending routes could be handled under a more specific EU rule set than before, while stablecoin-related lending channels could face a direct restriction.

In practice, the baseline would change from a framework that does not cover crypto lending to one that could. That would mean leverage caps, DeFi access certification, and possible limits on arranging lending tied to unauthorised stablecoins, while other parts of MiCA would remain unchanged unless the Commission adds them.

Market reaction

We track BTC, but we only have 0 price points in that window. The series is stored every half hour, so newer events will have it. Computing it from two points would not be a reaction, it would be a coincidence.

How the story was built

Every piece in order, with the time its news medium declares — if it is not believable we use ours and say so — and what it added to what was already known at that point. Arriving first is not the same as adding something.

first
Sep 24 10:30
+1 h 48 m
Sep 24 12:17
crypto.news context
Its angle: oversight, according, framework
+1 d 9 h
Sep 25 20:13
Unchained context
Its angle: intermediaries, decentralised, intermediated; with quotes
+1 d 10 h
Sep 25 20:50
The Defiant echo
No new facts: authorization, restrictions, regulation

Has this happened before?

WhenWhat happenedFigure
24 days ago Tether Rejected This MiCA Rule. Now the ECB Wants It Gone event 2 actors in common · 2 news media