Bitget Disables Withdrawals For Every Asset After $165 Million Moves To One Address

UNCLASSIFIEDBitget Disables Withdrawals ForEvery Asset After $165 MillionMoves To One Address11IMPORTANCECLOSED1NEWS MEDIA1PIECESSep 24, 2026 21:44blockboard.net
In Exchanges

Bitget’s wallets sent about $165 million to one address across Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base on Sept. 24. After that transfer, withdrawals were listed as disabled across the exchange’s asset and network entries, while deposits and spot trading stayed online.

Share on X Share on Telegram Share on Reddit Share on WhatsApp

What this rests on

Claim by claim, with its source
✓
On Sept. 24, wallets labeled as belonging to Bitget moved about $165 million to the same address across Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base.
Bitget Disables Withdrawals For Every Asset After $165 Million Moves To One Addr
✓
Roughly 90 minutes after the last of those transfers, Bitget’s public API showed withdrawals as disabled for every asset and network it returns.
Bitget Disables Withdrawals For Every Asset After $165 Million Moves To One Addr
✓
Bitget later had withdrawals disabled across 4,930 asset-network entries.
Bitget Disables Withdrawals Across 4,930 Asset-Network Entries
✓
Deposits and spot trading remained online while withdrawals were halted.
Bitget Disables Withdrawals Across 4,930 Asset-Network Entries

What it means

Who it affects, what changes and what is still unconfirmed

Each sentence links inside to the piece that supports it.

Bitget users and anyone trying to move assets out of the exchange notice the change immediately because withdrawals were listed as disabled, while deposits and spot trading stayed available. That means activity inside the platform continued in some forms even as outbound movement was halted.

Market reaction

ET Ethereum the event is about this asset from 2 h before to 4 h after the line marks the first headline
published
-0.05 % before publication
-0.27 % after
$2,691price at publication
13series points

How the story was built

Every piece in order, with the time its news medium declares — if it is not believable we use ours and say so — and what it added to what was already known at that point. Arriving first is not the same as adding something.

first
Sep 24 21:42

Has this happened before?

WhenWhat happenedFigure
24 days ago CFTC Weighs Enforcement Probe Into Kalshi’s Ether Perps Over Repeating $5,500 Trades event 1 actors in common · 2 news media
24 days ago Uniswap-Arbitrum Delegate Program (UADP) Communication Thread event 1 actors in common · 2 news media
24 days ago Exploit: Hegic(old contract) ($80K) event 1 actors in common · 2 news media
24 days ago Kalshi Rejects Wash-Trading Claims After Analyst Flags Repeated $5,500 Ether Perp Trades event 1 actors in common · 2 news media
24 days ago CME Group to List Bitcoin Cash and Uniswap Futures Oct. 19 event 1 actors in common · 2 news media