legal matter

Prosecutors Cite Bitcoin Fog Ruling Against Roman Storm's Venue Challenge

0Importance
closedStatus
2News media
2Pieces
Published
Updated
Since then
2 new reports
Also mentions
BTC

Federal prosecutors cited a Bitcoin Fog appeals ruling in their October 5 filing opposing Roman Storm’s post-trial acquittal bid. The filing said the precedent supports keeping the money-laundering and unlicensed money-transmission counts tied to Tornado Cash in New York, while the venue issue remains contested.

Key claims & sources

✓
Prosecutors also pointed to Manhattan Tornado Cash activity as part of their effort to keep those charges in New York.
✓
Storm responded on X by pointing to FinCEN’s withdrawn proposed mixer rule and saying it was pulled over concerns about chilling legitimate activity.
✓
On October 5, federal prosecutors filed against Roman Storm’s post-trial acquittal bid and cited the Bitcoin Fog appeals ruling in that filing.
✓
The government said the ruling supports its position that venue was proper in New York for the money-laundering and unlicensed money-transmission counts tied to Tornado Cash.
✓
The dispute is over whether New York can try the Tornado Cash co-founder after a court upheld jurisdiction in the Bitcoin Fog case.

What it means

People watching the case in New York notice that the venue fight is still active, because prosecutors are using the Bitcoin Fog ruling to support trying the Tornado Cash counts there. That matters today to Storm and to anyone following the venue question, since the filing keeps the money-laundering and unlicensed money-transmission charges anchored in Manhattan.

Before this filing, the venue question was being argued on its own terms; now the Bitcoin Fog ruling is being used in the Storm case as a precedent. In practice, that means the government is not changing the charges, but is using a separate appeals decision to back its position that New York is the proper forum for those counts.

Market reaction i

BitcoinBTC it is the asset of the company or protocol in the event
first headline
-0.1% 2 h before
-0.4% 4 h after
$84,159price at publication
12data points

Coverage timeline

Every piece in order, with the time its news medium declares — if it is not believable we use ours and say so — and what it added to what was already known at that point. Arriving first is not the same as adding something.

first
Oct 7 09:58
+2 h 58 m
Oct 7 12:55
Crypto Economy context
Its angle: specifically, sufficiently, transmission; with quotes