Crypto.com operator Foris Dax wins dismissal of cookie privacy suit as plaintiffs get 30 days to refile

LEGAL MATTERCrypto.com operator Foris Dax winsdismissal of cookie privacy suit asplaintiffs get 30 days to refile20IMPORTANCECLOSED1NEWS MEDIA1PIECESOct 9, 2026 20:10blockboard.net

A federal judge in California dismissed a privacy class action against Crypto.com’s operator after finding the two plaintiffs had not shown standing. The dismissal was without prejudice, and the plaintiffs were given time to amend and refile the case.

What this rests on

Claim by claim, with its source
✓
Judge Edward M. Chen dismissed the cookie-tracking class action against Foris Dax in California after raising the standing issue himself and saying the court must check jurisdiction on its own.
✓
Chen signed the dismissal order on October 6 in Ortiz v. Foris Dax, Inc.
✓
The court said the two plaintiffs had not shown a concrete injury from the alleged website tracking.
✓
The plaintiffs may amend their complaint by Nov. 5, 2026.

What it means

Who it affects, what changes and what is still unconfirmed

Each sentence links inside to the piece that supports it.

Crypto.com users and the two plaintiffs are the immediate people affected, because the class action is no longer active in its current form and the case can be refiled. Foris Dax remains under the same lawsuit caption for now only if an amended complaint is filed, and the dismissal order was entered in California on October 6.

The practical change is that the case was dismissed without prejudice rather than decided on the merits, so the filing can be amended instead of ending there. What stays the same is that the dispute still centers on alleged website tracking and whether the plaintiffs can show concrete injury, which the court said they had not shown.

Market reaction

CR Cronos it is the asset of the company or protocol in the event from 2 h before to 4 h after the line marks the first headline
published
-1.76 % before publication
+1.74 % after
$0price at publication
12series points

The move was larger before the first headline than after. That is an observation, not an explanation: the market also moves on things nobody publishes.

How the story was built

Every piece in order, with the time its news medium declares — if it is not believable we use ours and say so — and what it added to what was already known at that point. Arriving first is not the same as adding something.

Has this happened before?

WhenWhat happenedFigure
10 days ago Federal judge dismisses privacy lawsuit against Crypto.com over cookie tracking event 1 actors in common · 3 news media
15 days ago ICBA Sues OCC Over Crypto Trust Charters event 1 actors in common · 9 news media
18 days ago House Oversight Committee expands probe to Hyperliquid, Crypto.com event 1 actors in common · 10 news media