regulation and policy

Ukraine’s central bank opposes crypto bill, citing monetary sovereignty concerns

44Importance
no updates 6h+Status
7News media
7Pieces
Published
Updated
Since then
5 new reports
Also mentions
BTC

Ukraine’s central bank has said it cannot support draft law No. 10225-d on virtual assets in its current form and has asked lawmakers to revise it before the second reading. The objections focus on monetary sovereignty, financial stability, and the way the bill would handle foreign tokens and market access.

Key claims & sources

✓
On Nov. 4, the National Bank of Ukraine said it could not support draft law No. 10225-d on virtual assets in its current form and asked lawmakers to revise it before the second reading.
✓
A parliamentary committee moved the bill back to the floor on Nov. 4 while the central bank set out its position in a Telegram post the same day.
✓
The National Bank of Ukraine said the final version omits safeguards that had been discussed in negotiations, and it said the draft should not undermine monetary sovereignty, price stability, financial stability, or economic security.
✓
The central bank said it supports crypto regulation under MiCA principles and international standards, while opposing a version of the bill that it says would weaken monetary sovereignty.
✓
The central bank said the bill leaves foreign tokens that function like electronic money outside its control and that this raises monetary sovereignty concerns.

What it means

Ukraine has tried to legalize crypto since September 2021, when Zelensky signed a 'Virtual Assets' law that never took effect because parliament failed to pass the accompanying tax code changes. Bill 10225-d is the latest attempt to finish that job, four years on, with Kyiv also trying to align with the EU's MiCA framework as it pursues accession talks. The National Bank's Nov. 4 objection shows that basic question of who regulates crypto, and under what constraints, is still unresolved.

Until the bill is reworked, exchanges and wallet providers operating in Ukraine stay in the same legal gray zone they have occupied for years, unable to get clean banking relationships or licensing certainty. Lawmakers now have to decide whether the central bank or the securities regulator controls market access, a split that determines which firms can register and which get shut out. Traders and remittance users, many relying on crypto under wartime capital controls, gain nothing new from this version of the law. (per crypto.news)

The NBU's complaint is really about who keeps control of monetary policy when a population already uses crypto to dodge hryvnia capital controls imposed since the 2022 invasion. Framing the fight as 'monetary sovereignty versus MiCA alignment' is fair, but it also lets the central bank claim broad veto power over any access rules it dislikes. A regulator asking to keep tight control over market entry is not obviously the same thing as protecting financial stability, and the bill's drafters have reason to push back.

The committee's Nov. 4 vote sent the bill back to the floor rather than killing it, so the next marker is whether a revised draft restores the safeguards the NBU says were dropped before a second reading is scheduled. If lawmakers rewrite the text to satisfy the central bank, Ukraine could finally get a working crypto law years after the 2021 version stalled. If they don't, the bill risks another indefinite delay in the Rada. (per coindesk.com)

Market reaction i

Total crypto marketall crypto assets combined no single asset in the event: read against the whole market
first headline
-0.1% 2 h before
-3.0% 4 h after
$2.7Tmarket cap at publication
12data points

Coverage timeline

Every piece in order, with the time its news medium declares — if it is not believable we use ours and say so — and what it added to what was already known at that point. Arriving first is not the same as adding something.

+4 min
Nov 5 12:55
Crypto Briefing context
Its angle: legalization, maintaining, strategies
+44 min
Nov 5 13:34
crypto.news context
Its angle: cryptocurrency, provisions, regulators
+1 h 39 m
Nov 5 14:30
Unchained context
Its angle: translation, unchained, withholds; with quotes
+2 h 41 m
Nov 5 15:32
Crypto Economy context
Its angle: authorization, participation, uncontrolled; with quotes
+2 h 54 m
Nov 5 15:45
Bitcoin Magazine echo
No new facts: recommendations, circulation, legalized; with quotes
+4 h 40 m
Nov 5 17:30
CR Cryptopolitan echo
No new facts: platforms, objection, complaint; with quotes