Ankr Ethereum Bridge Loses More Than $303,000 in Five-Transaction Exploit

56Importance
updatingStatus
2News media
Published
Updated

Ankr’s Ethereum bridge was drained of more than $303,000 in five withdrawals tied to a previously redeemed Optimism deposit. The bridge stayed unpaused after those withdrawals, and the event was reported by two different crypto newsrooms.

Key claims & sources

✓
The contract stayed unpaused after withdrawals that referenced a small Optimism deposit already redeemed.
✓
The event involved a five-transaction exploit on Ankr’s Ethereum bridge.
✓
Ankr’s Ethereum bridge lost more than $303,000 after five suspicious withdrawals connected to a prior Optimism deposit that had already been redeemed.
✓
The withdrawals were reported on November 9, 2026.

What it means

Ankr’s Ethereum bridge sits in the cross-chain infrastructure layer that lets assets move between networks, and that is where this incident took place. Bridge contracts are especially sensitive because they hold and account for assets across chains, so a problem in one contract can interrupt transfers or expose balances tied to that route. The November 9, 2026 timing places this event as a recent operational security problem for a live bridge rather than a historic one.

Users and builders who rely on Ankr’s bridge now have a clear reason to check whether the contract state, withdrawal handling, or pause controls changed after the exploit. Anyone moving assets across Ethereum and Optimism paths will want to know whether transfers through this route remain available and whether any balances or workflows need to be adjusted. If a bridge contract stays unpaused during suspicious withdrawals, operational safeguards become as important as the transfer logic itself.

This case adds to the long-running tension around bridges: they are useful because they connect separate chains, but they also centralize a lot of value and trust in a small set of contracts. A five-transaction exploit is a reminder that the mechanics of replayed or reused deposit references can matter as much as the headline balance lost. The risk is not just the amount taken, but the fragility of the infrastructure that users depend on to move assets between networks.

Market reaction i

Ankr NetworkANKR it is the asset of the company or protocol in the event

Ankr Network fell 1.1% in the 4 hours after the first headline, after rising 0.7% in the 2 hours before.

$0.00387185 price at the headline
+0.7% 2 h before
-1.1% 4 h after
-1.1% 3 h after (so far)
First headline

10 prices, one every 30 minutes

Coverage timeline

Every piece in order, with the time its news medium declares — if it is not believable we use ours and say so — and what it added to what was already known at that point. Arriving first is not the same as adding something.

first
Nov 9 08:53
+1 h 23 m
Nov 9 10:17
crypto.news echo
No new facts: previously, suspicious, november

Thefts of a similar size

WhenWhat happenedFigure
2.8 years ago SolDragon (DRAGON) · Rug pull incident $304.6k
2.8 years ago FoxFunnies (FXN) · Rug pull incident $304k
2.8 years ago BoxyDude (BOX) · Rug pull incident $303.4k
3.0 years ago Changpeng Zhao (CZ) · Rug pull incident $302k
2.6 years ago Fake Oasis AI · Rug pull incident $301.6k

4289 incidents stored · 1297 were as large as this one or larger ($303k)