Crypto.com operator Foris Dax wins dismissal of cookie privacy suit as plaintiffs get 30 days to refile

0Importance
closedStatus
1News media
Published

A federal judge in California dismissed a privacy class action against Crypto.com’s operator after finding the two plaintiffs had not shown standing. The dismissal was without prejudice, and the plaintiffs were given time to amend and refile the case.

Key claims & sources

✓
Judge Edward M. Chen dismissed the cookie-tracking class action against Foris Dax in California after raising the standing issue himself and saying the court must check jurisdiction on its own.
✓
Chen signed the dismissal order on October 6 in Ortiz v. Foris Dax, Inc.
✓
The court said the two plaintiffs had not shown a concrete injury from the alleged website tracking.
✓
The plaintiffs may amend their complaint by Nov. 5, 2026.

What it means

Crypto.com users and the two plaintiffs are the immediate people affected, because the class action is no longer active in its current form and the case can be refiled. Foris Dax remains under the same lawsuit caption for now only if an amended complaint is filed, and the dismissal order was entered in California on October 6.

The practical change is that the case was dismissed without prejudice rather than decided on the merits, so the filing can be amended instead of ending there. What stays the same is that the dispute still centers on alleged website tracking and whether the plaintiffs can show concrete injury, which the court said they had not shown. (per tokenpost.com)

Market reaction i

CronosCRO it is the asset of the company or protocol in the event

Cronos rose 1.7% in the 4 hours after the first headline, after falling 1.8% in the 2 hours before.

$0.0604 price at the headline
-1.8% 2 h before
+1.7% 4 h after
+1.0% 12 h after
First headline

47 prices, one every 30 minutes · The move was larger before the first headline than after: an observation, not an explanation. The market also moves on things nobody publishes.

Coverage timeline

Every piece in order, with the time its news medium declares — if it is not believable we use ours and say so — and what it added to what was already known at that point. Arriving first is not the same as adding something.

Has this happened before?

WhenWhat happenedFigure
32 days ago Federal judge dismisses privacy lawsuit against Crypto.com over cookie tracking event 1 actors in common · 3 news media
37 days ago ICBA Sues OCC Over Crypto Trust Charters event 1 actors in common · 9 news media