Datavault AI shares crash after company says it can’t withdraw its Bitcoin from Biconomy
- Published
- Updated
- Since then
- 8 new reports
Datavault AI disclosed that it could not withdraw bitcoin held on Biconomy, and the news was followed by a steep drop in its stock. The disclosures were tied to a Scilex investment deal and led the company to say it will restate several financial reports.
Key claims & sources
What it means
Datavault AI is one of a wave of small-cap, Nasdaq-listed firms that added bitcoin to their balance sheets after MicroStrategy popularized the corporate treasury strategy starting in 2020. Unlike MicroStrategy, which custodies its coins directly, Datavault AI parked its holdings on Biconomy, a lesser-known exchange, rather than in cold storage or with a regulated custodian. That choice meant the company's bitcoin exposure depended entirely on a third party's solvency and operational integrity, a risk that went largely unscrutinized until withdrawals stopped working in June.
Shareholders who bought Datavault AI stock as a leveraged bitcoin proxy now hold a company forced to restate its books, cutting reported assets by $92.2 million at the end of 2025. Auditors must sign off on a balance sheet that no longer reflects coins it cannot move, and the firm faces disclosure and possibly Nasdaq compliance questions over why a four-month freeze went unreported. Investors who priced the stock on its bitcoin holdings lost nearly half their position's value in a single session.
The episode exposes a gap between the pitch of corporate bitcoin treasuries and their execution: holding 817 BTC, reportedly worth $65 million, on an exchange rather than in self-custody reintroduces exactly the counterparty risk bitcoin was built to remove. Firms chasing treasury-strategy headlines rarely disclose custody arrangements in detail, leaving shareholders to assume cold-storage-grade security that may not exist. Whether Biconomy's freeze reflects insolvency, a technical fault, or something else remains unexplained, and that ambiguity itself is the problem.
Market reaction i
Coverage timeline
Every piece in order, with the time its news medium declares — if it is not believable we use ours and say so — and what it added to what was already known at that point. Arriving first is not the same as adding something.
Crypto Briefing
scoop
U.Today
echo
AMBCrypto
adds
Crypto Economy
echo
Decrypt
echo