Hackers hijack Microsoft SQL Servers to deploy Gh0st RAT and Monero miners

45Importance
updatingStatus
2News media
Published
Updated

FortiGuard Labs identified a campaign targeting internet-facing Microsoft SQL Servers with Monero miners and Gh0st RAT. The activity shows how exposed database servers can be turned into mining hosts and remote-control footholds.

Key claims & sources

✓
Crypto Briefing said hackers hijacked Microsoft SQL Servers to deploy Gh0st RAT and Monero miners.
✓
Crypto Briefing framed weak security practices on SQL Servers as a route to severe network breaches, pointing to credential management and system configuration as key issues.
✓
FortiGuard Labs said a campaign was breaking into internet-facing Microsoft SQL Servers and installing Monero mining software plus remote-access malware on infected machines.
✓
The malware deployed in that campaign included Gh0st RAT, which can be used to control compromised systems and steal data.

What it means

Microsoft SQL Server is widely used in enterprise environments, and internet-facing installations become part of the attack surface when they are left exposed. The FortiGuard Labs report places this activity in the context of server compromise rather than a blockchain-specific flaw, with Monero mining software and Gh0st RAT appearing on the same machines. For operators, the story is about hardening database access, credentials, and configuration before an exposed server becomes a foothold.

Monero mining on hijacked servers turns spare compute into an asset for attackers while the presence of remote-access malware creates a second layer of risk. In practice, that means victims can lose resources and also face ongoing machine control if the compromise is not detected quickly. The mix of mining and remote access shows how a single intrusion can be used for both extraction and persistence.

The case sits at the intersection of infrastructure security and cryptocurrency abuse, where attackers use ordinary business systems to run mining code rather than targeting a coin protocol itself. That tension matters because it shifts attention from market narratives to basic system hygiene, and it shows how crypto-linked tooling can be folded into broader cybercrime. It also underlines that Monero’s privacy features are only one part of the story; the immediate issue here is compromised enterprise servers.

Market reaction i

Total crypto marketall crypto assets combined no single asset in the event: read against the whole market

The total crypto market fell 0.5% in the 4 hours after the first headline, after rising 0.2% in the 2 hours before.

$2.3T market cap at the headline
+0.2% 2 h before
-0.5% 4 h after
-1.7% 12 h after
First headline

44 prices, one every 30 minutes

Coverage timeline

Every piece in order, with the time its news medium declares — if it is not believable we use ours and say so — and what it added to what was already known at that point. Arriving first is not the same as adding something.

first
Nov 13 18:26
+17 h 39 m
Nov 14 12:05
crypto.news context
Its angle: controlling, fortiguard, uncovered

Other recent incidents

WhenWhat happenedFigure
2 days ago Pool Party · Smart contract vulnerability incident $215k
2 days ago Pennysia · Arbitrary External Call incident $5.1k
3 days ago Edel Finance incident $300k
4 days ago Rujira AMM Strategies · Swap Logic Flaw incident $200k
5 days ago Initia · Private key leak incident $615k

4312 incidents stored