MSCI’s new index rules put Strategy at risk of removal starting November 30

REGULATORY DECISIONMSCI’s new index rules putStrategy at risk of removalstarting November 3052IMPORTANCEQUIET13NEWS MEDIA14PIECESOct 15, 2026 23:35blockboard.net

MSCI adopted new index-exclusion rules that place Strategy and Metaplanet at risk of removal from its equity indexes, with final names due on Nov. 11 and implementation set for Nov. 30. Separate coverage adds that a May simulation had already flagged Strategy and Metaplanet for deletion, with SharpLink on a watchlist and Upexi also identified for deletion. One report says MSCI will assess companies with substantial non-operating assets using operating-asset, expense, cash-flow, valuation and capital-raising tests, and that firms flagged on four of five tests become ineligible under the new framework.

What this rests on

Claim by claim, with its source
✓
A May simulation had flagged Strategy and Metaplanet for deletion, with SharpLink placed on a watchlist.
✓
The same simulation also identified Upexi for deletion.
✓
One report put Strategy on potential removal from MSCI global indexes and said JPMorgan had estimated possible passive outflows of US$2.8 billion if that happened.
✓
MSCI will assess companies with substantial non-operating assets using operating-asset, expense, cash-flow, valuation and capital-raising tests.
✓
Companies that fail four of the five tests become ineligible, while existing constituents must fail across their two latest annual periods.
✓
MSCI adopted new index-exclusion rules that put Strategy and Metaplanet at risk of removal from its global equity indexes.
✓
MSCI will name the affected firms on Nov. 11 and apply the changes after trading closes on Nov. 30.

Market reaction

BT Bitcoin it is the asset of the company or protocol in the event from 2 h before to 4 h after the line marks the first headline
published
-0.10 % before publication
-0.11 % after
$82,166price at publication
12series points

How the story was built

Every piece in order, with the time its news medium declares — if it is not believable we use ours and say so — and what it added to what was already known at that point. Arriving first is not the same as adding something.

first
Oct 15 21:04
+1 h 11 m
Oct 15 22:15
+2 h 30 m
Oct 15 23:34
The Defiant echo
No new facts: simulation, watchlist, putting
+3 h 43 m
Oct 16 00:48
Cointelegraph echo
No new facts: methodology, announce, upexi
+7 h 26 m
Oct 16 04:31
crypto.news echo
No new facts: implementation, decisions
+8 h 48 m
Oct 16 05:52
Crypto News Australia context
Its angle: valuation, replacing, negative
+11 h 30 m
Oct 16 08:34
CoinDesk context
Its angle: important, providers, eligible
+12 h 58 m
Oct 16 10:03
Crypto Briefing echo
No new facts: landscapes, altering, reliant
+13 h 22 m
Oct 16 10:26
Unchained echo
No new facts: consultations, announcement, newsletter; with quotes
+14 h 57 m
Oct 16 12:01
CR Cryptopolitan echo
No new facts: confirmation, potentially, threatens; with quotes
+17 h 8 m
Oct 16 14:12
Crypto Economy echo
No new facts: approximately, preliminary, assessment
+19 h 28 m
Oct 16 16:32
Bitcoin Magazine echo
No new facts: institutional, consultation, implemented; with quotes
+21 h 11 m
Oct 16 18:16
Decrypt echo
No new facts: dominated, targeting, single; with quotes

Has this happened before?

Nothing comparable yet.

What could happen next

What the prediction markets currently price as likely. This is context, not a forecast of ours: there is money on it, and that is all we show.

2 % +1 pts
Kalshi · $4,415,187 of open interest · resolves on Jan 1, 2027
1 % no series
Kalshi · $1,022,099 of open interest · resolves on Oct 1, 2026
3 % +0 pts
Kalshi · $751,631 of open interest · resolves on Jan 1, 2027
11 % +0 pts
Kalshi · $601,478 of open interest · resolves on Jan 1, 2027