NCA and Blockchain Association urge US Treasury to reconsider GENIUS Act rules – Details
Published Updated 1 new report since it was first published
The U.S. Treasury has finalized stablecoin rules under the GENIUS Act, and two major crypto industry groups are pressing for revisions to how those rules are written. The dispute centers on how stablecoin oversight will be applied in practice and what that means for issuers and users.
What this rests on
What it means
Stablecoins sit at the center of crypto payments and trading because they are designed to track a fiat currency, and U.S. rules around them shape how issuers, exchanges, and institutions handle reserves, compliance, and product design. The GENIUS Act framework now gives the Treasury a finalized set of stablecoin rules to work with, which makes the U.S. position on this part of the market more explicit. That matters because stablecoin regulation often becomes the baseline for broader crypto business decisions in the United States.
For companies building with stablecoins, the practical question is how much freedom remains under the new rule set and what changes the Treasury might still consider. If the National Cryptocurrency Association and the Blockchain Association succeed in getting revisions, issuers could face a different compliance path than the one now on the books. If the rules stay as finalized, firms will need to adapt their operations to the current Treasury framework rather than waiting for a softer version.
The larger tension is between regulatory clarity and the flexibility that crypto firms have long wanted in a fast-moving market. A finalized federal stablecoin regime can make the U.S. market easier to navigate, but it can also harden requirements before the industry has settled on its preferred operating model. That trade-off is especially sharp in stablecoins, where policy choices can shape who can issue, distribute, and use dollar-linked tokens at scale.
Still unresolved is which parts of the GENIUS Act framework the industry groups want changed and how the Treasury will respond. The next meaningful signal would be an updated draft, a formal clarification, or a public rejection of the requested revisions. Until then, the market knows the rules are finalized, but not whether the industry’s push will alter how those rules are applied.
Market reaction
How the story was built
Every piece in order, with the time its news medium declares — if it is not believable we use ours and say so — and what it added to what was already known at that point. Arriving first is not the same as adding something.
What US 10-year Treasury has done before
| When | What happened | Figure |
|---|---|---|
| 3 days ago | US 10-year Treasury: 5.15 (+0.06) rise | Oct 2026 |
| 6 days ago | US 10-year Treasury: 5.09 (-0.01) fall | Oct 2026 |
| 7 days ago | US 10-year Treasury: 5.1 (-0.09) fall | Oct 2026 |
| 8 days ago | US 10-year Treasury: 5.19 (-0.02) fall | Oct 2026 |
| 9 days ago | US 10-year Treasury: 5.21 (-0.03) fall | Oct 2026 |
FRED series, with the value of each release and its change.