NEAR Intents’ General Manager Says Part of the $3.8 Million Exploit Came Back in Monero

HACK OR EXPLOITNEAR Intents’ General ManagerSays Part of the $3.8 MillionExploit Came Back in Monero25IMPORTANCEREOPENED1NEWS MEDIA1PIECESOct 13, 2026 02:24blockboard.net

NEAR Intents’ general manager said part of the funds returned after the $3.8 million exploit came back in Bitcoin, while the remainder came back in Monero. He also said 34.59 BTC made up about 78% of the total returned funds, and the team is still working to convert the Monero into Tether.

What this rests on

Claim by claim, with its source
✓
The attacker who drained about $3.8 million from NEAR Intents returned only part of the funds in Bitcoin, and the rest came back in Monero.
✓
Alex Shevchenko said the return was discussed in an episode recorded on Oct. 8.
✓
Shevchenko said 34.59 BTC accounted for about 78% of the total returned funds.
✓
The team is still working to convert the remaining Monero into Tether.

What it means

Who it affects, what changes and what is still unconfirmed

Each sentence links inside to the piece that supports it.

Users and NEAR Intents’ customers see that some of the stolen funds have been returned, but not in a final form that is already settled into the token the team wants to hold. The unresolved Monero portion still needs conversion work, so the situation remains active rather than fully closed.

Before this return, the stolen amount was out of reach; now part of it is back, split between Bitcoin and Monero. What remains the same is that the returned Monero is still not in Tether, so the practical end state for those funds has not yet changed.

Market reaction

NE NEAR Protocol it is the asset of the company or protocol in the event from 2 h before to 4 h after the line marks the first headline
published
+3.59 % before publication
+1.73 % after
$5price at publication
12series points

The move was larger before the first headline than after. That is an observation, not an explanation: the market also moves on things nobody publishes.

How the story was built

Every piece in order, with the time its news medium declares — if it is not believable we use ours and say so — and what it added to what was already known at that point. Arriving first is not the same as adding something.

first
Oct 13 02:24

Thefts of a similar size

WhenWhat happenedFigure
16 days ago NEAR Intents · Bridge Logic Flaw incident $3.8M
2.1 years ago Onyx incident $3.8M
3.6 years ago Rocket Pool incident $3.8M
4.3 years ago XCarnival incident $3.8M
5.6 years ago DODO AMM incident $3.8M

4200 incidents stored · 561 were as large as this one or larger ($3.8M)