Travala’s Crypto Loyalty Program Passes 170,000 Members, Sets Long-Term Goal of 30% of AVA Supply Locked

PRODUCTTravala’s Crypto Loyalty Program Passes170,000 Members, Sets Long-Term Goalof 30% of AVA Supply Locked37IMPORTANCECLOSED3NEWS MEDIA4PIECESOct 2, 2026 12:06blockboard.net

Travala and the AVA Foundation announced new standard lock levels for the AVA Smart Program, and said around 16% of AVA’s circulating supply is already locked. They also set a long-term target of 30% of AVA’s circulating supply locked, while the loyalty program has passed 170,000 members.

What this rests on

Claim by claim, with its source
✓
They said around 16% of AVA’s circulating supply is already locked.
✓
Travala’s crypto loyalty program passed 170,000 members.
✓
Travala and the AVA Foundation announced new standard lock levels for the AVA Smart Program on October 2, 2026.
✓
They set a long-term goal of 30% of AVA’s circulating supply locked.

What it means

Who it affects, what changes and what is still unconfirmed

Each sentence links inside to the piece that supports it.

Travala members and AVA holders will notice a new set of lock levels in the AVA Smart Program, and the program is now being presented alongside a membership count above 170,000. That means the loyalty system and the token-locking setup are both being updated at the same time, with the current locked share described as around 16%.

In practice, the program now has standard lock levels where those rules are being added, while the publicly stated long-term target is 30% of AVA’s circulating supply locked. What stays the same is that the material already mentions existing locked supply and a loyalty program structure; what changes is the new lock-level framework around it.

Market reaction

AV AVA (Travala) it is the asset of the company or protocol in the event from 2 h before to 4 h after the line marks the first headline
published
+0.00 % before publication
+0.74 % after
$0price at publication
12series points

How the story was built

Every piece in order, with the time its news medium declares — if it is not believable we use ours and say so — and what it added to what was already known at that point. Arriving first is not the same as adding something.

+1 d
Oct 2 12:00
+1 d 1 h
Oct 2 12:21

Has this happened before?

Nothing comparable yet.