hack or exploit

Bitget 'Potentially Hacked' as $183 Million Vanishes From Exchange Wallets

13Importance
closedStatus
2News media
2Pieces
Published
Also mentions
ETH

Wallets labeled as Bitget’s were drained on Thursday afternoon, with onchain records showing more than $180 million moved out between 2:31 p.m. and 4:55 p.m. ET. One report put the suspected loss at over $170 million, and another said the receiving address was later tagged by Etherscan as Bitget Exploiter 1.

Key claims & sources

✓
Three hot wallets and one cold wallet were under scrutiny after assets were moved into Ethereum.
✓
A newly created wallet pulled funds from hot and cold reserves labeled as Bitget’s across multiple blockchains in under an hour.
✓
Onchain records show more than $180 million moved out of wallets labeled as Bitget’s between 2:31 p.m. and 4:55 p.m. ET on Thursday afternoon.
✓
Etherscan now tags the receiving address as Bitget Exploiter 1, and Bitget had not issued a public statement by 5 p.m. ET.

What it means

Bitget users and anyone holding funds in the exchange’s labeled wallets would notice the incident first because the wallets were drained over a short period on Thursday afternoon. The activity involved both hot and cold reserves, and one report said the assets were moved into Ethereum.

In practice, this changes the status of the labeled wallets from ordinary storage to wallets that were actively being emptied, while the onchain tagging also gives investigators a specific receiving address to track. The public-facing exchange position stayed the same through 5 p.m. ET, when no statement had been issued. (per coinfomania.com)

Market reaction i

Bitget TokenBGB it is the asset of the company or protocol in the event
first headline
-6.8% 2 h before
+1.0% 4 h after
$1.92price at publication
12data points

The move was larger before the first headline than after. That is an observation, not an explanation: the market also moves on things nobody publishes.

Coverage timeline

Every piece in order, with the time its news medium declares — if it is not believable we use ours and say so — and what it added to what was already known at that point. Arriving first is not the same as adding something.

first
Sep 24 21:15
+8 min
Sep 24 21:23
Unchained adds
Breaks the figures down; the largest, $65M, with quotes

Thefts of a similar size

WhenWhat happenedFigure
8.7 years ago BitGrail · Improper access control incident $195M
3.2 years ago JPEX · Scam incident $194.3M
4.3 years ago Nomad · Forged Proof incident $190M
4.6 years ago Beanstalk · Flashloan Governance Attack incident $181M
4.6 years ago BeanstalkFarms · DAO + flashloan incident $181M

4282 incidents stored · 44 were as large as this one or larger ($183M)