legal matter

Milei targets five journalists after LIBRA criminal case dismissal

0Importance
closedStatus
3News media
3Pieces
Published
Updated
Since then
2 new reports

An Argentine judge dismissed the LIBRA criminal case and cleared President Javier Milei along with 10 other people. After the ruling, Milei singled out five journalists and questioned who would compensate him for the reputation damage he says he suffered.

Key claims & sources

✓
After the dismissal, Milei named five journalists in an attack on LIBRA coverage and asked who would compensate him for alleged damage to his reputation.
✓
An Argentine judge issued a 60-page ruling that cleared Javier Milei and 10 others in the LIBRA case, and the judge said Milei’s post promoting the token did not by itself establish fraud.
✓
The ruling found no “criminally relevant deception” in Milei’s post, which was the basis for dismissing the criminal case.
✓
The LIBRA investigation had been a criminal case before the judge dismissed it, and the ruling covered Milei plus 10 other people.

What it means

LIBRA was the token Milei promoted in a February 2025 social media post, after which its value collapsed and investors filed fraud complaints, prompting Argentine prosecutors to open a criminal case naming the president alongside ten other defendants. That case turned on whether a sitting head of state endorsing a crypto asset constitutes deception under Argentine law, a question with no direct precedent and one that made the LIBRA affair a test of how far presidential speech can expose a leader to prosecution.

With the case dismissed, Milei and the ten co-defendants face no further criminal exposure from the 60-page ruling, closing the prosecutorial track that LIBRA investors had hoped would establish liability. Milei instead names five journalists and asks who will pay for his reputational damage, a move that shifts the confrontation from the courtroom to the press. Reporters who covered LIBRA now face the prospect of defamation claims or political pressure, while investors who lost money retain only civil, not criminal, avenues to pursue.

A judge finding no 'criminally relevant deception' in a president's promotional post sets a demanding bar for prosecuting officials over crypto endorsements, and some will read that as sound legal caution while others see impunity for conduct that moved markets. Milei turning a legal win into a public campaign against named journalists raises a separate and sharper question: whether exoneration in court is being used to discourage scrutiny of how officials promote tokens in the first place.

Watch whether Argentine prosecutors appeal the 60-page dismissal covering Milei and the ten other defendants, since an appeal would reopen the fraud question the judge just closed. Also watch whether Milei follows his public naming of five journalists with formal defamation suits, which would turn a political attack into a legal one, and whether any LIBRA investors file civil claims now that the criminal path has ended. (per ambcrypto.com)

Market reaction i

Total crypto marketall crypto assets combined no single asset in the event: read against the whole market
first headline
0.0% 2 h before
+0.1% 4 h after
$2.7Tmarket cap at publication
12data points

Coverage timeline

Every piece in order, with the time its news medium declares — if it is not believable we use ours and say so — and what it added to what was already known at that point. Arriving first is not the same as adding something.

first
Oct 24 12:10
+4 h 14 m
Oct 24 16:24
+16 h 51 m
Oct 25 05:00
AMBCrypto context
Its angle: investigation, argentina, dismisses