analysis

Solana co-founder tells US firms opposing tokenized stock trading to go private

25Importance
updatingStatus
2News media
2Pieces
Published
Updated
Since then
1 new report

Anatoly Yakovenko said U.S. public companies that do not want their shares traded on-chain should leave public markets. The remarks came as tokenized stock trading gained momentum and more well-known firms pushed back against it.

Key claims & sources

✓
Anatoly Yakovenko said U.S. firms that oppose having their shares traded on-chain should go private.
✓
The clash over tokenized stock trading was presented as a sign of tensions between innovation and control in public markets.
✓
Yakovenko framed U.S. public companies as needing to adapt to digital assets and said companies unwilling to allow tokenized share trading should withdraw from public markets.
✓
The dispute centers on tokenized stock trading, which was described as booming while a growing list of household-name companies opposed it.

What it means

Solana is a blockchain associated with fast on-chain activity, and tokenized stocks place traditional equity exposure into that kind of trading environment. Anatoly Yakovenko’s comments fit a broader push to move more market activity onto blockchains while keeping the underlying shares tied to public companies. The dispute is happening now because tokenized stock trading has become more visible and more firms are taking a public stance against it.

For investors, brokers, and platforms, the practical question is whether U.S. public companies will tolerate their shares being represented and traded on-chain. If firms refuse, tokenization providers may have to find different listings, different structures, or different issuers. If firms accept, they open the door to a trading model that sits outside the familiar public-market setup.

The fight is really about who sets the rules for access to equity markets: issuers, exchanges, or the platforms building tokenized products. Public-company shares have usually been governed through exchange rules, disclosure systems, and transfer controls, while on-chain trading tries to make them behave more like crypto assets. That creates a direct tension between market openness and corporate control over how stock can circulate.

Still unresolved is which companies will actually permit tokenized trading of their shares and what form that permission would take. It is also unclear how many household-name firms will keep resisting, and whether the market will settle on a standard that issuers can accept. The next clear signal would be a specific public company, exchange, or tokenization platform setting out the terms for on-chain trading.

Market reaction i

SolanaSOL the event is about this asset
first headline
+0.3% 2 h before
+1.2% 4 h after
$101.14price at publication
12data points

Coverage timeline

Every piece in order, with the time its news medium declares — if it is not believable we use ours and say so — and what it added to what was already known at that point. Arriving first is not the same as adding something.

first
Oct 28 17:55
+11 h 10 m
Oct 29 05:05
CR Cryptopolitan context
Its angle: intercontinental, corporations, heavyweights

Where this sits in the Solana series

WhenWhat happenedFigure
32 days ago SOL a 124.6 $ high today it sits -19.8% from there
5 days ago SOL a 99.18 $ low today it sits +0.8% from there

From what we have stored, starting 35 days ago.